← For You

For Parents

Your child is not weak. The product is designed.

How to read this page. Tap any underlined word to see the precise term and a short definition. Expand any "Deeper" box for the evidence and contested points. The main text works on its own — you can skip both and still get the whole argument.

You have probably noticed something. Your child — who is curious, funny, capable — spends hours on a screen and comes away worse for it. More anxious, more irritable, less present. You have tried talking about it, setting limits, taking the phone at bedtime. Sometimes it helps. Mostly the pull comes back.

This is not a failure of parenting. And it is not a failure of your child. The platforms your child uses were designed by teams of engineers, with years of research and billions of data points, specifically to be as compelling as possible. The infinite scroll, the notification sent to pull a user back, the algorithm that learns what keeps each individual user watching — these are product features, not accidents.

Understanding that changes the conversation you can have.

What the research shows

Adolescents who spend more than three hours per day on social media are significantly more likely to experience poor mental health outcomes. A large UK cohort study finds the association stronger for girls than for boys, and some research finds it stronger for passive scrolling than active social interaction, though that finding is contested (a 2022 review of 40 survey studies found that most did not bear it out). Facebook's own internal research — disclosed by Frances Haugen in 2021 — found that among teenage girls who already felt bad about their bodies, one in three said Instagram made them feel worse. The company knew. The product continued.

What is genuinely uncertain: how much of the link is social media causing harm and how much is struggling teenagers using it more, and, if it does cause harm, whether it is a main cause of the rise in poor mental health among young people or one contributing factor among many. The direction of the evidence is clear enough to act on, even while the causal question remains debated.

What actually helps

Phone-free bedrooms — the single change with the most consistent evidence behind it. A meta-analysis of 20 studies found that a phone used at bedtime, and even one merely present in the bedroom, is associated with too little sleep; and sleep is the best-documented of the pathways proposed from heavy use to anxiety and depression, though how far heavy use causes them is contested — see the research. Explain the reasoning rather than impose it: a limit that is understood is easier to keep.

Delayed smartphone access — the case for waiting until at least secondary school, and ideally later, is growing, and several countries have acted: Australia has made 16 the minimum age for social media accounts. But the outcome evidence is still thin — this is a judgement call, not a finding (where the age-restriction evidence stands). A basic phone that calls and texts is a different product from a smartphone with full social media access.

Phone-free schools — a growing movement with encouraging but mixed evidence: bans help with focus and in-school use, and probably with bullying, but are not on their own a mental-health fix. A Norwegian study found less bullying and better outcomes for girls; a large English study found no difference in wellbeing (the studies are on the Educators page). If your child's school does not have a policy, you can advocate for one, and offer the head teacher parental backing for the change.

Understanding together, not lecturing — the Bad News game (getbadnews.com) is a browser game of about 15 minutes teaching six documented manipulation techniques from the inside; in the study of 15,000 players behind it, people got better at spotting and resisting misinformation after playing. Playing it together turns that into a conversation rather than a lecture. The Netflix series Adolescence (2025), watched together and discussed, is one of the more natural ways to open a conversation about the manosphere, a worldview that attributes male difficulties primarily to women and feminism.

Honesty about your own use — the most credible thing you can do. If you are scrolling at the dinner table, the conversation about limits will not land.

What the research says to avoid

The aim is conversation, not compliance, and a sudden absolute ban without explanation works against it. Framing heavy use as "addiction" activates self-blame and a sense of lost control rather than curiosity — "this was designed to be this compelling" is both more accurate and more useful. Monitoring apps are not the safety net they look like: in reviews they wrote, children said such apps hurt their relationship with their parents, and in a survey of parents and teens, more monitoring went with more online risk, not less — though that may be because parents monitor the teens already in trouble.

Trusted organisations for parents

Official and non-profit bodies with practical, per-age guidance and, where relevant, reporting routes. The chips mark the country each one serves.

• F.E.A.S.T. (Families Empowered and Supporting Treatment of Eating Disorders) Global — Free peer support for families facing an eating disorder — forums, support groups and family guides — from a global non-profit run by carers, with its worldwide list of eating-disorder organisations (mainly English).
• INHOPE Global — A network of national hotlines for reporting illegal content involving children.
• NCMEC CyberTipline USGlobal — Report child sexual exploitation — US-based, takes international reports.
• Better Internet for Kids EU — The European Commission’s portal — includes the directory of national Safer Internet Centres with helplines per EU country.
• SaferNet Brasil BR — Brazil’s online-safety NGO and INHOPE hotline: free chat or e-mail help for children, teens and parents, and anonymous reporting of child sexual abuse material and other online crimes (Portuguese).
• خط نجدة الطفل 16000 (المجلس القومي للطفولة والأمومة) EG — Egypt’s child helpline: call 16000 free, 24 hours a day, or WhatsApp 01102121600 — for any child up to 18 at risk, including bullying and exploitation online (Arabic).
• 119 — Allô Enfance en danger FR — For a child or teen in danger, or an adult worried about one: call 119 free, day and night, from any phone in France; the call does not appear on the phone bill. There is also a chat for young people. A public service (French).
• 3018 — e-Enfance FR — France’s national number for young people facing bullying, cyberbullying or other online abuse, and for their parents: call 3018 or chat in the 3018 app, free and anonymous, every day 9:00–23:00. It can have harmful posts and accounts removed within hours (French).
• Anorexie Boulimie Info Écoute (FFAB) FR — Questions about an eating disorder, for yourself or someone close? Call 09 69 325 900 (normal call rate) on Monday, Tuesday, Thursday or Friday, 16:00–18:00, to reach psychologists, doctors and eating-disorder associations (French).
• CLEMI FR — The body in charge of media and information literacy across the French school system since 1983, with classroom resources, teacher training and guides for families (French).
• Internet Sans Crainte FR — France’s national programme for helping young people use the internet well: hundreds of free resources for 3–18-year-olds, their parents and teachers. Part of the French Safer Internet Centre, run by Tralalere (French).
• Point de Contact FR — France’s hotline for reporting illegal content online — child sexual abuse material, hate speech, terrorist content — anonymously and free, through its website or app. A founding member of INHOPE (French).
• Child Helpline 1098 IN — For children in India, or an adult calling for a child: call 1098 free, 24 hours a day; emergency calls can be forwarded to 112. It runs under the Ministry of Women and Child Development’s Mission Vatsalya, with the States.
• Meri Trustline (RATI Foundation) IN — Confidential help in India for children, women and people from marginalised identities facing online sexual abuse, cyberbullying, deepfakes or leaked photos: call or WhatsApp 6363176363, Monday to Friday 9:00–17:00, or e-mail any time. Not an emergency service: if you are in danger, call 112.
• Siguronline (La Strada) MD — Moldova’s digital-safety centre, run by La Strada: confidential chat and email help for children, teens and parents about anything that goes wrong online, and anonymous reporting of child sexual abuse material (Romanian, Russian).
• Telefonul Copilului 116 111 (Moldova) MD — For children and teens in Moldova: call 116 111 free, day and night, about anything — run for the Ministry of Labour and Social Protection (Romanian, Russian).
• De Kindertelefoon NL — For children and teens in the Netherlands: call free on 0800-0432 or chat, every day from 11:00 to 21:00 (Dutch).
• Netwerk Mediawijsheid NL — The Dutch national media-literacy network, set up by the Ministry of Education in 2008, with over 1,000 partner organisations: knowledge and tools for professionals, the Week van de Mediawijsheid and the annual Mediawijsheid Kennisdag (Dutch).
• Offlimits — Hulplijn NL — Help after something bad happened online, such as sextortion or shared nude images: free and anonymous chat, mail or phone — 0800-0033 — Monday to Thursday 07:00–23:00, Friday 09:00–17:00, Sunday 10:00–18:00 (Dutch).
• Veiliginternetten.nl NL — Government-backed practical advice on online safety and privacy (Dutch).
• Ora de Net (Salvați Copiii) RO — Romania’s Safer Internet Centre: help with anything that goes wrong online on 0744 360 446, daily from 10:00 to 17:00, or report child sexual abuse material anonymously (Romanian).
• Telefonul Copilului RO — For children and teens in Romania: call free on 116 111, Monday to Friday from 10:00 to 20:00 (Romanian).
• Child Helpline 116111 (خط مساندة الطفل) SA — For every child in Saudi Arabia, not only children facing violence: call 116111 free for confidential advice and support; the National Family Safety Program refers emergencies directly (Arabic).
• Internet Matters UK — Practical online-safety guidance per age group and per platform.

Get local help →

Deeper — why act now if the science is still debated +

You may have heard that researchers disagree about social media and teen mental health, and wonder whether that means waiting for certainty. Here is the honest shape of it. What is established: a consistent correlation between heavy use and worse outcomes, worse for girls, across many large studies. What is contested: how much of that is social media causing harm versus struggling teens using it more, how large the effect is, and whether passive use is worse than active use (a 2022 review of 40 survey studies found that most did not bear it out) — a real scientific debate (Haidt and Twenge on one side, Orben and Przybylski on the other).

What tips the balance toward acting without waiting is not the contested effect size, and it is not that Facebook's own internal research, disclosed by Frances Haugen, settles the science: those were internal surveys, no stronger than the published studies. It is two other things. The company saw the signal and the product continued, which is evidence about conduct that no effect-size debate touches. And the interventions that help — phone-free bedrooms, delayed access, conversation over surveillance — are low-cost and low-risk whether the effect turns out large or modest. You are not betting the house on a contested study; you are taking sensible steps that cost little if the sceptics are right and matter a great deal if they are not.

Mental Health — the full evidence →
Age Restrictions →
What to Do →
Where to get help →
Yes, but… →